- isse.eu.com
- Compare
- Titan 2.0 vs Era Wallet
Ellipal Titan 2.0 vs HWLT Era Wallet
What Titan 2.0 does better (6) and where Era Wallet wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Security6.4
4.9Open source4.9
3.0Bitcoin features7.4
6.4Ease of use5.4
4.9Connectivity8.3
Why is Titan 2.0 better than Era Wallet?
- 100% air-gappedYes · Era Wallet: No
- Screen size4″ vs 2.7″+48%
- Battery capacity1,400 mAh vs 170 mAh8.2×
- Duress PIN / decoy walletYes · Era Wallet: No
- Colour screenYes · Era Wallet: No
- FIDO2 / U2F security keyYes · Era Wallet: No
Why is Era Wallet better than Titan 2.0?
- TaprootNo · Titan 2.0: Yes
- Compatible third-party wallets0 vs 3
- Weight140 g vs 45 g3.1×
- Shamir backup (SLIP-39)No · Titan 2.0: Yes
- NFC backup cardNo · Titan 2.0: Yes
- User-added entropy (dice)No · Titan 2.0: Yes
- Message signingNo · Titan 2.0: Yes
- Coin controlNo · Titan 2.0: Yes
- Own node connectionNo · Titan 2.0: Yes
- Tor supportNo · Titan 2.0: Yes
- Replace-by-feeNo · Titan 2.0: Yes
- NFCNo · Titan 2.0: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Security | ||
| Secure Element chip | Yes | Yes |
| Secure Element certification | EAL5+ | — |
| Air-gapped signing | Yes | Yes |
| 100% air-gapped | Yes | No |
| Supply-chain & tamper protection | Yes | Yes |
| Secure boot | — | Yes |
| Anti-klepto (anti-exfil) signing | No | No |
| Firmware & open source | ||
| Open-source firmware | No | No |
| Source code available | No | No |
| Reproducible builds | No | No |
| Upgradable firmware | Yes | Yes |
| Firmware update via | microSD | NFC |
| Bitcoin-only firmware / edition | No | No |
| Device lock | ||
| PIN lock | Yes | Yes |
| PIN entered on the device | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint unlock | No | No |
| Duress PIN / decoy wallet | Yes | No |
| Brick / wipe PIN | No | No |
| Wipe after failed attempts | Yes | Yes |
| Time-delayed unlock | No | No |
| Anti-phishing words | No | No |
| Keys & backup | ||
| BIP39 passphrase | Yes | Yes |
| Shamir backup (SLIP-39) | No | Yes |
| Seed XOR | No | No |
| BIP85 child seeds | No | No |
| 24-word seed | Yes | Yes |
| SeedQR backup | No | No |
| microSD backup | No | No |
| NFC backup card | No | Yes |
| User-added entropy (dice) | No | Yes |
| Stateless use (no stored keys) | No | No |
| Multiple seeds on one device | Yes | Yes |
| Bitcoin features | ||
| Multisig | No | No |
| Taproot | No | Yes |
| Miniscript | No | No |
| Message signing | No | Yes |
| Coin control | No | Yes |
| Own node connection | No | Yes |
| Tor support | No | Yes |
| Replace-by-fee | No | Yes |
| Silent Payments | No | No |
| Spending limits | No | No |
| Testnet | No | Yes |
| Supported assets | ||
| Altcoins & tokens | Yes | Yes |
| Bitcoin only | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Signing connectivity | QR code | NFC, QR code |
| USB | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| QR code camera | Yes | Yes |
| Animated QR (UR) | No | Yes |
| microSD signing | No | No |
| Screen & input | ||
| Screen | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | 4″ | 2.7″ |
| Screen type | IPS | E-Ink |
| Screen resolution | — | 264 × 176 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour screen | Yes | No |
| Gorilla Glass | No | Yes |
| Controls | Touch Screen | Touch Screen |
| QWERTY keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & power | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | Yes |
| Battery capacity | 1,400 mAh | 170 mAh |
| Removable battery | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 140 g | 45 g |
| Length | 118 mm | 87 mm |
| Width | 66 mm | 54 mm |
| Thickness | 9.7 mm | 5.5 mm |
| Materials | Metal | Aluminum |
| Water / dust resistance | Yes | Yes |
| IP rating | IP65 | IPX7 |
| Several colours available | No | No |
| Warranty (months) | 12 | 12 |
| Assembled in | Hong Kong | China |
| DIY build possible | No | No |
| Apps | ||
| Official apps | Android, iOS | Android, iOS |
| Desktop app | No | No |
| Mobile app | Yes | Yes |
| Works with wallet apps | — | Nunchuk, Sparrow, BlueWallet |
| Compatible third-party wallets | 0 | 3 |
| Other features | ||
| FIDO2 / U2F security key | Yes | No |
| Password manager | No | No |
