- isse.eu.com
- Compare
- Era Wallet vs S1
HWLT Era Wallet vs SafePal S1
What Era Wallet does better (18) and where S1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Security3.0
4.9Open source4.9
7.4Bitcoin features5.4
5.4Ease of use3.0
8.3Connectivity4.9
Why is Era Wallet better than S1?
- Screen size2.7″ vs 1.3″2.1×
- TouchscreenYes · S1: No
- Compatible third-party wallets3 vs 0
- Weight45 g vs 126 g2.8×
- Wipe after failed attemptsYes · S1: No
- Shamir backup (SLIP-39)Yes · S1: No
- NFC backup cardYes · S1: No
- User-added entropy (dice)Yes · S1: No
- Message signingYes · S1: No
- Own node connectionYes · S1: No
- Tor supportYes · S1: No
- Replace-by-feeYes · S1: No
Why is S1 better than Era Wallet?
- Battery capacity170 mAh vs 400 mAh2.4×
- Colour screenNo · Era Wallet: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Security | ||
| Secure Element chip | Yes | Yes |
| Secure Element certification | — | EAL5+ |
| Air-gapped signing | Yes | Yes |
| 100% air-gapped | No | No |
| Supply-chain & tamper protection | Yes | Yes |
| Secure boot | Yes | Yes |
| Anti-klepto (anti-exfil) signing | No | No |
| Firmware & open source | ||
| Open-source firmware | No | No |
| Source code available | No | No |
| Reproducible builds | No | No |
| Upgradable firmware | Yes | Yes |
| Firmware update via | NFC | USB |
| Bitcoin-only firmware / edition | No | No |
| Device lock | ||
| PIN lock | Yes | Yes |
| PIN entered on the device | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint unlock | No | No |
| Duress PIN / decoy wallet | No | No |
| Brick / wipe PIN | No | No |
| Wipe after failed attempts | Yes | No |
| Time-delayed unlock | No | No |
| Anti-phishing words | No | No |
| Keys & backup | ||
| BIP39 passphrase | Yes | Yes |
| Shamir backup (SLIP-39) | Yes | No |
| Seed XOR | No | No |
| BIP85 child seeds | No | No |
| 24-word seed | Yes | Yes |
| SeedQR backup | No | No |
| microSD backup | No | No |
| NFC backup card | Yes | No |
| User-added entropy (dice) | Yes | No |
| Stateless use (no stored keys) | No | No |
| Multiple seeds on one device | Yes | No |
| Bitcoin features | ||
| Multisig | No | No |
| Taproot | Yes | Yes |
| Miniscript | No | No |
| Message signing | Yes | No |
| Coin control | Yes | Yes |
| Own node connection | Yes | No |
| Tor support | Yes | No |
| Replace-by-fee | Yes | No |
| Silent Payments | No | No |
| Spending limits | No | No |
| Testnet | Yes | No |
| Supported assets | ||
| Altcoins & tokens | Yes | Yes |
| Bitcoin only | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Signing connectivity | NFC, QR code | QR code |
| USB | No | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| QR code camera | Yes | Yes |
| Animated QR (UR) | Yes | No |
| microSD signing | No | No |
| Screen & input | ||
| Screen | Yes | Yes |
| Screen size | 2.7″ | 1.3″ |
| Screen type | E-Ink | IPS |
| Screen resolution | 264 × 176 | 320 × 320 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Colour screen | No | Yes |
| Gorilla Glass | Yes | No |
| Controls | Touch Screen | Buttons |
| QWERTY keyboard | Yes | No |
| Battery & power | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | Yes |
| Battery capacity | 170 mAh | 400 mAh |
| Removable battery | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 45 g | 126 g |
| Length | 87 mm | 86 mm |
| Width | 54 mm | 54 mm |
| Thickness | 5.5 mm | 6 mm |
| Materials | Aluminum | Plastic |
| Water / dust resistance | Yes | No |
| IP rating | IPX7 | — |
| Several colours available | No | No |
| Warranty (months) | 12 | 12 |
| Assembled in | China | China |
| DIY build possible | No | No |
| Apps | ||
| Official apps | Android, iOS | Android, iOS, Browser extension |
| Desktop app | No | No |
| Mobile app | Yes | Yes |
| Works with wallet apps | Nunchuk, Sparrow, BlueWallet | — |
| Compatible third-party wallets | 3 | 0 |
| Other features | ||
| FIDO2 / U2F security key | No | No |
| Password manager | No | No |
