- isse.eu.com
- Compare
- Lightning Network DIY Hardware Wallet vs Model T
LNHW Lightning Network DIY Hardware Wallet vs Trezor Model T
What Lightning Network DIY Hardware Wallet does better (1) and where Model T wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Open source9.3
Why is Lightning Network DIY Hardware Wallet better than Model T?
- Thickness8 mm vs 10 mm+25%
Why is Model T better than Lightning Network DIY Hardware Wallet?
- Open-source firmwareNo · Lightning Network DIY Hardware Wallet: Yes
- Reproducible buildsNo · Lightning Network DIY Hardware Wallet: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Security | ||
| Secure Element chip | — | No |
| Air-gapped signing | — | No |
| 100% air-gapped | — | No |
| Supply-chain & tamper protection | — | Yes |
| Secure boot | — | Yes |
| Anti-klepto (anti-exfil) signing | — | No |
| Firmware & open source | ||
| Open-source firmware | No | Yes |
| Source code available | Yes | Yes |
| Reproducible builds | No | Yes |
| Firmware licence | — | GPLv3 |
| Upgradable firmware | — | Yes |
| Firmware update via | — | USB |
| Bitcoin-only firmware / edition | — | Yes |
| Device lock | ||
| PIN lock | — | Yes |
| PIN entered on the device | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint unlock | — | No |
| Duress PIN / decoy wallet | — | No |
| Brick / wipe PIN | — | Yes |
| Wipe after failed attempts | — | Yes |
| Time-delayed unlock | — | Yes |
| Anti-phishing words | — | No |
| Keys & backup | ||
| BIP39 passphrase | — | Yes |
| Shamir backup (SLIP-39) | — | Yes |
| Seed XOR | — | No |
| BIP85 child seeds | — | No |
| 24-word seed | — | Yes |
| SeedQR backup | — | No |
| microSD backup | — | No |
| NFC backup card | — | No |
| User-added entropy (dice) | — | No |
| Stateless use (no stored keys) | — | No |
| Multiple seeds on one device | — | No |
| Bitcoin features | ||
| Multisig | — | Yes |
| Taproot | — | Yes |
| Miniscript | — | No |
| Message signing | — | Yes |
| Coin control | — | Yes |
| Own node connection | — | Yes |
| Tor support | — | Yes |
| Replace-by-fee | — | Yes |
| Silent Payments | — | No |
| Spending limits | — | No |
| Testnet | — | Yes |
| Supported assets | ||
| Altcoins & tokens | — | Yes |
| Bitcoin only | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Signing connectivity | — | USB-C |
| USB | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | No |
| NFC | — | No |
| QR code camera | — | No |
| Animated QR (UR) | — | No |
| microSD signing | — | No |
| Screen & input | ||
| Screen | — | Yes |
| Screen size | — | 1.54″ |
| Screen type | — | LCD |
| Screen resolution | — | 240 × 240 |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Colour screen | — | Yes |
| Gorilla Glass | — | No |
| Controls | — | Touch Screen |
| QWERTY keyboard | — | No |
| Battery & power | ||
| Built-in battery | — | No |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 92 g |
| Length | 51 mm | 64 mm |
| Width | 23 mm | 39 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 10 mm |
| Materials | — | Plastic |
| Water / dust resistance | — | No |
| Several colours available | — | No |
| Warranty (months) | — | 24 |
| Assembled in | — | Czech Republic |
| DIY build possible | — | No |
| Apps | ||
| Official apps | — | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, Web |
| Desktop app | — | Yes |
| Mobile app | — | Yes |
| Works with wallet apps | — | Bitcoin Safe, Theya, Wasabi, Zeus, Nunchuk, Electrum, Sparrow, Specter Desktop, Blockstream Green, BlueWallet, Bitcoin Keeper, Casa, Unchained |
| Compatible third-party wallets | — | 13 |
| Other features | ||
| FIDO2 / U2F security key | — | Yes |
| Password manager | — | No |
Related comparisons
vs
LNHW Lightning Network DIY Hardware WalletvsOneKey Pro 2
vsBC Vault OnevsLNHW Lightning Network DIY Hardware Wallet
vsBlack Arrow Software eWalletvsLNHW Lightning Network DIY Hardware Walletvs
LNHW Lightning Network DIY Hardware WalletvsFeitian JuBiter Bladevs
LNHW Lightning Network DIY Hardware WalletvsKeyWallet Touchvs
LNHW Lightning Network DIY Hardware WalletvsFranck Muller Vanguard Encrypto