How we scoreBlogAdvertise
  1. isse.eu.com
  2. Hardware wallets
  3. TwentyTwo Portal
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to TwentyTwo Portal

8 Bitcoin-only wallets at a similar price that compete with the Portal — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Alternatives to the Portal

Blockstream Jade Core
1
Blockstream · 2026Jade Core
7.4
6% cheaper ≈ €90
  • Reproducible builds
  • Compatible third-party wallets 11 vs 2
  • Screen size 1.9″ vs 0.91″
  • Thickness 12 mm vs 5 mm
  • NFC
Frostsnap Device
2
Frostsnap · 2025Device
5.3
11% pricier ≈ €110
  • Reproducible builds
  • Touchscreen
  • Mobile app
  • Multisig
  • Compatible third-party wallets 0 vs 2
Blockstream Jade Plus
3
Blockstream · 2025Jade Plus
9.4
42% pricier ≈ €140
  • Reproducible builds
  • Compatible third-party wallets 11 vs 2
  • Screen size 1.9″ vs 0.91″
  • Thickness 12 mm vs 5 mm
  • NFC
Coinkite Coldcard Mk5
4
Coinkite · 2026Coldcard Mk5
6.9
62% pricier ≈ €160
  • Secure Element chip
  • Reproducible builds
  • Compatible third-party wallets 14 vs 2
  • Open-source firmware
  • Thickness 7.5 mm vs 5 mm
Block Bitkey
5
Block · 2024Bitkey
4.3
42% pricier ≈ €140
  • Mobile app
  • Fingerprint unlock
  • Built-in battery
  • Taproot
  • Screen
Cardware Wallet
6
Cardware · 2025Wallet
5.8
28% cheaper ≈ €70
  • Secure Element chip
  • Screen size 2.14″ vs 0.91″
  • Air-gapped signing
  • Open-source firmware
  • Taproot
Coinkite Coldcard Mk4
7
Coinkite · 2022Coldcard Mk4
6.3
62% pricier ≈ €160
  • Secure Element chip
  • Reproducible builds
  • Compatible third-party wallets 14 vs 2
  • Open-source firmware
  • Screen size 0.8″ vs 0.91″
Foundation Passport Core
8
Foundation · 2022Passport Core
8.9
83% pricier ≈ €180
  • Secure Element chip
  • Reproducible builds
  • Compatible third-party wallets 14 vs 2
  • Weight 120 g vs 30 g
  • Thickness 19 mm vs 5 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare